Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 14:56

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sneaky Trade Idea: Heat Get Warriors Star In Deal That Nobody Could See Coming - Yahoo Sports
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
MindsEye team deploys first hotfix as they scramble to make the dang thing work - Polygon
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Michaels completes acquisition of Joann’s intellectual property and fan-favorite labels - Boston.com
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What is the most heartbreaking thing your child has told you?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
No Man's Sky Gets A Massive Switch 2 Upgrade And It's All Free - Kotaku
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
The S&P 500 closes at 6,000 as bulls aim for return to record territory - MarketWatch
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
I'm British and feel ashamed of the crimes of British colonialism. What should I do?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.